fbpx
Connect with us

Sports Law

The obligation to pay in Leeds vs RB Leipzig case

A dispute recently arose concerning football player Jean-Kevin Augustin who at the time of the dispute was a player of RB Leipzig and loaned out to Leeds United FC. 

The dispute concerned whether Leeds was obliged to purchase the registration rights of the player in question from RB Leipzig based on a “purchase obligation” that was included as part of the terms and conditions that were stipulated in the loan agreement which was entered into between the two clubs back in January 2020.

In accordance with the loan agreement, such “purchase obligation” meant that Leeds would have to purchase the player in question permanently if Leeds obtained promotion to the English Premier League prior to July 1, 2020.

It so transpired that the 2019-20 season was interrupted abruptly on March 13, 2020 owing to the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic.

Upon the resumption of the season, Leeds United ended up winning promotion as champions of the Championship on July 22, 2022, 22 days after the date stipulated in the loan agreement.

It so transpired that in April 2020, Leeds United enquired via e-mail with the player’s agent on the possibility of extending the duration of the loan agreement to cover the extended playing period of the 2019-20 once the season was to resume and to check whether same would be acceptable by RB Leipzig.

Subsequently, in June 2020, Leeds United alleged that they had informed both the player and the player’s agent that their request made in April 2020 was being withdrawn owing to the player’s off-form and thus they were not willing to extend the duration of the loan agreement.

RB Leipzig replied back to Leeds in June 2020, stating that they were willing to extend the duration of the loan agreement but were not willing to re-negotiate the instalments due to them.

At the same time, owing to the COVID-19 disruptions, in June 2020 FIFA announced temporary amendments to the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players.

Soon after the resumption of the Championship in mid-June 2022, Leeds informed RB Leipzig that it was under no obligation to purchase the player since in their view the purchase obligation in the loan agreement is voided as a result of not being able to effect the transfer by July 1, 2020.

On July 13, 2020, RB Leipzig proceeded to insert a FIFA TMS instruction to complete the permanent transfer of the player to Leeds. The English side did not enter the necessary counter-instruction to complete the permanent transfer of the player.

Following Leeds’s refusal to honour the terms of the loan agreement, RB Leipzig instituted proceedings in front of the FIFA Players’ Status Committee (the Committee) to request Leeds to pay RB Leipzig the full purchase obligation.

During the proceedings, the committee stressed that it must take into account all the specific circumstances of the present matter as well as the structure of the loan agreement signed between the parties.

Ultimately, the committee had to establish what the true intention of the parties was when they agreed upon the terms of the loan agreement. In the view of the committee, there was no dispute to the fact that Leeds indeed was promoted to the Premier League at the end of the 2019-20 season, which promotion occurred at a later stage than traditionally occurs owing to the unprecedented COVID-19 disruption.

As a result, the committee was of the firm opinion that it is reasonable and logical to conclude that the original intention of the parties was to transfer the player on loan until the end of the sporting season 2019-20 (originally fixed on June 30, 2020) and that such transfer would have acquired a permanent status simply in case of promotion of Leeds to the English Premier League, regardless of the effective date of achievement.

The committee also reiterated that as established by FIFA as well, the COVID-19 outbreak was not a force majeure situation in any specific country or territory. As a result, the committee upheld RB Leipzig’s claim to be paid a transfer fee of €21 million by Leeds in accordance with the purchase obligation in the loan agreement.

Leeds subsequently lodged an appeal from the Committee’s decision to the CAS, with the CAS analysing in significant detail the facts pertaining to the case together with what triggers a case of force majeure.

In conclusion, the CAS panel opined that there was no room for the application of the concepts of force majeure or rebus sic stantibus and thus concluded that the purchase obligation was indeed triggered, a result of which meant that Leeds has to pay to RB Leipzig €6,740,174 as the first instalment of the transfer fee, plus 5 per cent interest per annum as from October 1, 2020 until the date of effective payment.

Leeds’ appeal was thus dismissed and the appealed decision was confirmed in full.

Dr Robert Dingli is a Senior Associate at Dingli & Dingli Law Firm and specializes in sports law

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

11 − 3 =

Advertisement

World Cup News

Advertisement

More in Sports Law

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com